![]() Nowadays, the news comes as a curiosity, having no impact on our lives. Their approach? Mimicking the natural brain structure in 3D “neuromorphic chips.” It’s something that could be referred to as “reverse-engineering the brain”, since neuromorphic engineering is, in general, the process of modeling systems after the human brain and/or our neural system. Samsung, the South Korean giant, proposed its own way of creating brain-like chips. ![]() You may try Brave talk at Samsung Proposes Pasting Brains To Chips The big advantage over competing services is the fact you do not need to download additional software - it works right in your browser.ĭespite the advantages of Brave Talk over its competitors, if you have not heard of it (which most likely is the case) you will know what is the problem with introducing yet another competitor in this area - people tend to stick to defaults and/or stick to products their friends/coworkers/clients are already using. It offers an end-to-end encrypted video chat that is free to use. Jitsi is already a quite popular solution. ![]() As such, don’t expect ads, profiling, or logging metadata.īehind the scenes, it’s a “Jitsi as a service” offering. Their newest offering, Brave Talk, is marketed towards the privacy-conscious market. Brave Talkīrave, the company behind Brave Browser, and Brave Search, now wants a piece of the video calls & video conferencing market. The difference now is that the web browser is bundled with the environment, making setup even easier.ĭownload installers from the project’s GitHub page. The idea is still the same - you still run a Python environment with several popular Python libraries (NumPy, SciPy, pandas, ipywidgets, Matplotlib) ready to go. Last week, we have seen the restart of a JupyterLab App - “cross-platform standalone application distribution of JupyterLab.” The Data Science community will be happy to know that setting up Jupyter Lab now got a bit easier. US District Judge Leonie M Brinkema wrote: As technology evolves, there may come a time when artificial intelligence reaches a level of sophistication such that it might satisfy accepted meanings of inventorship. The judges in the US agree with their colleagues from the UK. As such, will they have our human rights or not? Going back to the core question - will machines ever be able to submit patents? ![]() Nobody seems to have predicted the increasingly important role that machines have, and will continue to have, in our lives.Īt the moment we do not have to concern ourselves with the possibility of the existence of sentient machines, though this could be the future. A machine cannotĮven though the reason is simple at first, and the decision could be deemed obvious, it is not clear whether the patent laws will have to be revisited in the future or not. In the judge’s reasoning, Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing wrote: Only a person can have rights. In a landmark case, the UK Court of Appeal has ruled that Artificial Intelligence cannot be the inventor of new patents. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |